Medical Scoring Systems

There are several scoring systems in intensive care units (ICUs) today.

 

Adult scoring systems

  • APACHE II was designed to provide a morbidity score for a patient. It is useful to decide what kind of treatment or medicine is given. Methods exist to derive a predicted mortality from this score, but these methods are not too well defined and rather imprecise.
  • APACHE III is an updated version.
  • SAPS II was designed to provide a predicted mortality, that does not reflect the expected mortality for a particular patient, but is good for benchmarking. In a rather simple way, it makes it possible to provide a single number that describes the morbidity of a number of patients.
  • SAPS III was designed to provide a realistic predicted mortality for a particular patient or a particular group of patients. It does this by calibrating against known mortalities on an existing set of patients, for a specific definition of mortality (like 30-days mortality). This way, it can answer questions like “Did we improve our quality of care from 2004 to 2005?” or “If hospital A’s patients had been treated at hospital B, would they have a better or a worse mortality?”.
Another Lost Stories :  Peta Tantangan Kesehatan Indonesia

 

Children scoring systems

  • PIM2 delivers a predicted mortality value, intended to be used for benchmarking.

 

Other scoring systems

  • SOFA was designed to provide a simple daily score, that indicates how the status of the patient evolves over time.
  • Glasgow Coma Scale (also named GCS) is designed to provide the status for the central nervous system. It is often used as part of other scoring systems.
  • CMM – Cancer Mortality Model
    • specific score to predict outcome of critical cancer patients
  • MPM – Mortality Probability Model
    • model to assess risk of death at ICU admission
    • has prediction models for assessment at admittance, 24h, 48h and 72h after
  • RIFLE – Risk, injury, failure, loss and end-stage kidney classification
    • has 3 severity levels (risk, injury and failure) and 2 possible outcomes (loss and end-stage)
  • CP – Child–Pugh
    • for patient with liver failure.
    • used also outside of the ICU.
  • Ranson Score
    • simple score used specifically for patients with pancreatitis
  • MODS – Multiple Organ Dysfunction Score
    • with similar objectives as SOFA Score
  • LODS – Logistic Organ Dysfunction System
    • developed for evaluation at admittance and not as a monitoring tool
  • APACHE I
  • APACHE II
    • used in patients with severe sepsis and acute pancreatitis,
  • APACHE III
  • APACHE IV
    • used to predict ICU mortality and LOS
Another Lost Stories :  Selamat Hari Dokter Nasional Indonesia 2016

 

References

  1. Soares M, Fontes F, Dantas J, Gadelha D, Cariello P, Nardes F, et al. (2004). “Performance of six severity-of-illness scores in cancer patients requiring admission to the intensive care unit: a prospective observational study”. Crit Care. 8 (4): R194–203. doi:10.1186/cc2870. PMC 522839. PMID 15312218.
  2. Strand K, Flaatten H (2008). “Severity scoring in the ICU: a review”. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 52 (4): 467–78. doi:10.1111/j.1399-6576.2008.01586.x. PMID 18339152.
  3. yamin, shagufta. “PREDICTIVE EFFICASY OF APACHE IV AT ICU.S OF CHK”.

 

Another Lost Stories :

 


Subscribe for FREE Monthly eDigest

* indicates required

Please Leave Your Comment ..